classwarfare

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label public workers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public workers. Show all posts

Monday, 22 July 2013

Detroit: motors, money and the municipality

Posted on 14:31 by Unknown
by Michael Roberts

Last week, the mayor of Detroit, America’s 18th largest city and the home of the flagship of Main Street America, the US auto industry, filed for bankruptcy with debts hitting $18-20bn.  On the same week, the behemoths of Wall Street, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan etc announced profits nearly back to their pre-crisis levels.  Those two bits of news just about sum up the winners and losers out of this crisis.

The aim of government policy nearly everywhere has been the restoration of the profitability of the capitalist sector, particularly its large companies, at the expense of the wages and conditions of working people, including their public services, pensions and welfare benefits.  In the financial crash, governments and the central banks reacted quickly with huge bailouts for greedy, corrupt and failing banks and in the case of the US launched the use of public money in billions to save the auto giants Ford and GM from bankruptcy.  The debts incurred from these bailouts and loss of public revenues from the ensuing Great Recession drove up the budget deficits and debt levels of the public sector, particularly the poorer and weaker cities and states in the US.

And Detroit is poor; it has a higher unemployment rate and high inequality of income and wealth, a falling population and declining industries (see http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/07/19/detroit-a-dying-doughnut/).  The bankruptcy filing follows decades of decline that have seen the automotive capital’s population fall from 2m in the 1950s to a little less than 700,000 currently – leading to a 40% drop in tax revenues since 2000.  America’s auto industry has suffered from foreign competition, poor technological development and bad planning decisions.  Ford, Chrysler and GM lose market share to the likes of BMW, Nissan, Toyota and even Fiat.  But what brought Ford and GM to their knees was no so much their poor vehicles sales but the huge losses they stood to suffer from their financial arms.  Increasingly, these companies got more revenue from selling credit and warranties and even mortgages through their ‘banking arms’ than through making and selling cars. When the financial crash came, that went down.

Defaulting on its debts would mean that Detroit cannot meet its obligations to its employees on wages and pensions and it cannot pay back the bonds held by pensions funds and Wall Street.  The city’s total debt is at least $18bn and could be as much as $20bn – $11bn of which is unsecured. The remaining $9bn that is secured will probably be paid back at 100 cents on the dollar.  The city’s unsecured debt includes $2bn of general obligation bonds and other financings, $3.5bn in pension liabilities that are underfunded and about $5.7bn in health and other benefits owed to workers.  Unsecured creditors say their worst case recovery would likely involve getting back 75 to 80 cents on the dollar.

Wall Street wants its claims met first.  Holders of the general obligation bonds argue that they should be paid before other unsecured claimants. Pension funds maintain that their rights are constitutionally protected and should have priority.  This circle will not easily be squared.  The city has had to borrow money to meet its already reduced operating budget and has cut services to the point where only a third of its ambulances are in service and only 40 per cent of its street lights work.  It now takes an hour for the police to respond to emergency calls.

Bankruptcy is the classic capitalist way of resolving the crisis: through the destruction of the value held by the current owners of the city’s debt and by reducing the incomes of the people working for the city.  After that, new capital can flourish on the ashes of the old.  The vultures are already picking at the pieces of Detroit real estate.  Rock Ventures has spent more than $1bn buying property in downtown Detroit.  These purchases are funded by hedge funds and by the very banks back in Wall Street that stand to lose some of the value of the Detroit bonds they hold.  Cheap real estate at bargain basement prices will compensate as poor people sell up and the better off leave the inner city.

Most of the city looks abandoned and broken down. But companies such as Quicken Loan, the mortgage originator, have moved into these cheaper areas and are buying up property by the street. Chrysler recently opened its first new Detroit-based corporate office in decades. Whole Foods, the upmarket food chain, has also opened its first outlet in Motown. And in September the city will break ground on its first urban tramline since the 1930s.Meanwhile back in Wall Street, all is bright and light.  Pre-crisis levels of profits are back.  The major banks made a combined $17.6bn in second-quarter net income, the best since the same period six years ago.

Of course, these are not the same banks that entered the crisis.  There has been a monumental restructuring and industry-wide profits are still down significantly. Even if the headline numbers for the survivors look attractive, they are still far from pre-crisis levels of profitability.  The average return on equity at the five big Wall Street institutions is 8.9%, less than half the returns reached in 2006 and 2007. But it is getting better, at the expense of the likes of the people of Detroit.
Read More
Posted in austerity, auto industry, banks, Pensions, public sector, public workers, US economy | No comments

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

Opportunity knocks (again) for BART Unions. Trayvon Martin murder is a union issue

Posted on 12:08 by Unknown
Trayvon Martin. Caused his own death according to Florida court
by Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

As to be expected AFL-CIO and Change to Win leaders don’t have too much to say about the Zimmerman verdict and what I could find on the AFL-CIO website was pretty lame. I looked at the CTW website which while not quite so drab also had nothing on there about this defeat for workers in this country and for black workers in particular.  On the AFL-CIO page Randi Weingarten of the AFT issued the following statement:

 “While we believe in the rule of law and the jury has spoken, the implications of the acquittal are profound. It is very disappointing that a racially profiled, unarmed African-American young man wearing a hoodie can be shot dead and there be no consequences for the perpetrator. This case reminds us that the path to racial justice is still a long one, and that our legal and moral systems do not always mesh. The proceedings in the Sanford, Fla., courtroom may well have dealt with the criminal aspects of the case, as defined by Florida law, but we will continue to deal with the moral ones. As the AFT pledged in a resolution passed at our 2012 convention, we remain steadfast in our commitment to fight for laws, policies and practices that will prohibit racial profiling at the federal, state and local levels.

“The disposition of this case is the antithesis of what we teach our children in school—that the law protects innocent victims and that no one has the right to take the law into his or her own hands. Everyone’s child matters. We pray for the strength of Trayvon’s parents and loved ones in this difficult time.”


Lee Saunders, the president of AFSCME, my former Union says:
“AFSCME is calling for the Justice Department to immediately conduct an investigation into the civil rights violations committed against Trayvon Martin. We know that it will take federal intervention and a massive grassroots movement but justice and positive change is still possible.
Bottom of Form
“In the fight for justice, it is time to stand our ground. As we have throughout our history, AFSCME will work with faith leaders, community groups and civil and human rights activists to create a more just society for all.”

Ho hum! Reading this reminds me of Nina Simone’s words from Mississippi Goddamn:

Picket lines
School boy cots
They try to say it's a communist plot
All I want is equality
For my sister my brother my people and me

Yes you lied to me all these years
You told me to wash and clean my ears
And talk real fine just like a lady
And you'd stop calling me Sister Sadie

Oh but this whole country is full of lies
You're all gonna die and die like flies
I don't trust you any more
You keep on saying 'Go slow!'
'Go slow!'

But that's just the trouble
'Do it slow'
Desegregation
'Do it slow'
Mass participation
'Do it slow'
Reunification
'Do it slow'
Do things gradually
'Do it slow'
But bring more tragedy
'Do it slow'
Why don't you see it
Why don't you feel it
I don't know
I don't know

Nina Simone

I checked the National Education Association’s website (NEA, the largest union in the country, and couldn’t find a word about Trayvon Martin and his murderer’s acquittal. I clicked on the link “Minority Community Outreach” and there was nothing there either. Like the Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden affairs where heroic individuals are being ruthlessly persecuted by the state for making the public aware of the violence, corruption and lies that are the norm for this government, Trayvon Martin is a non issue even on a page that deals with minority community involvement. This is as these issues are topics in every workplace, every coffee shop, every dinner table and drinking establishment.

And what does Ms. Weingarten mean by the “Rule of Law”. Laws are made by politicians of the 1% and in the interests of the 1%.  Would she say as a union leader in Nazi Germany that “we believe in the rule of law”? And what about the Jim Crow laws in the US Apartheid South? They were changed through direct action and violating the law not praying. One sees this term in the big business press all the time it means to respect laws that protect the capitalist class and their system, that’s what it means.  If those heroic figures that built the trade Union movement in this country had that attitude we wouldn’t have unions at all. We wouldn’t have sick leave or unemployment benefits, meager as they are; the UAW wouldn’t exist.  The Apartheid South would still be thriving if people had respect for the “rule of law”.

The union hierarchy is the only force that slavishly obeys the law except when it comes to dealing with their own members and the internal life of our organizations that they head.  Wall street crooks steal billions, politicians lie cheat and live off the fruits of bribery and the Union tops claim sainthood.  The bosses pass laws that are clearly against the interests of union members and all working people and the union hierarchy ensures they are not broken; anything to avoid a fight; send an e mail to the president and vote Democratic. They are terrified of a victory as it would increase expectations and inspire millions of workers drawing them in to activity after decades of savage attacks on our living standards.  Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is the trademark of the Union leaders atop organized labor.

Here in the Bay Area, a 4 day strike by Bay Area Rapid Transit workers galvanized attention for a
ATU members on strike
period.  Due to the ability of the BART workers to cripple the local economy contract negotiations between these two forces always makes headlines.  The bosses went on the offensive and demonized these workers in their media.  The union leaders as I explained in an earlier commentary have no answer to this as their general approach is that concessions have to be made.
After all, we all have to share the pain, there is a need for “shared sacrifice”.

The decision to halt the strike for 30 days was a mistake as it is hard to get workers back on the lines once they’ve been taken off.  With a strike you either win one or lose one. The decision to end the strike for what is termed a “cooling off” period was in order for the union hierarchy and their political allies in the Democratic Party to make some deal that the members can accept, hopefully with minor changes that bring less aggressive concessions.  It is my view that they were forced to call one due to the anger from below and the pressure they were facing to let off some steam in case the pot boiled over. 

It is still not too late but the labor leadership will not act unless they are absolutely forced to from below or replaced. The anger in the ranks is significant for BART workers as they have not had a raise in five years but all workers have been savaged over the past period. There is a golden opportunity that must not be lost here.  The other transit workers that operate the buses have their contract up and could legally strike with the BART workers, they are also in the same union as the train operators, the ATU. SEIU 1021 also represents BART employees like station agents and janitors. The city of Oakland workers  also in SEIU 1021 have suffered serious cuts and can also strike.  Water workers are also in contract talks and their contracts expired at the end of May I think.

Unfortunately, despite a mood among bus drivers to support BART workers at a transit board meeting, the decision by union officials not to bring bus drivers out with the them was a serious mistake and made victory less likely for both. Both BART and AC Transit workers face aggression and acts of violence from the public. The same is true for teachers.  But labor’s response is not more policing. Increase policing never helps workers and the poor and certainly doesn’t help the most oppressed sections of our class. All the ills and pressure of society weigh heavily on public sector workers like transit, city, teachers and water workers as we deal with the public every day. Our response must be jobs for all, housing, education, urban renewal, wages and an end to racism and sexism.  This will strengthen us with the public and will unite the class rather than dividing it.  Unity is not an abstract thing.  What are we uniting around?  It has to be made concrete. We cannot win without building links with the communities in which we live and work.

A strike by BART, AC Transit and the City of Oakland workers would open the door to the transformation of the mood among workers in and outside the unions. You want public support?  Here’s your chance. Taking a major public stand against the Zimmerman verdict and against the ongoing murder and incarceration of black youth will get a tremendous echo in this community along with a call for community involvement and help to win the strike around such demands as:

No to the 1%’s austerity agenda

No more police, no more jails but a massive hiring and job training program under the direction of the unions and community organizations.

A $20 an hour minimum wage

Free public transportation for all seniors

Increased services in mass transit (especially buses) including for the disabled

Free public education at all levels, reopen closed schools reduce class sizes and hire one million teachers

For a national public health service

Organized the unorganized.

The money fro these basic things can come from making the rich pay, ending all wars an occupations and nationalizing the banks to suggest a few.

These are just a few small ways a movement can be built around such a strike that would undoubtedly challenge the 1%’s austerity agenda and drive back their offensive. The slogan should be No more business as usual, it stops here in the Bay Area, the home of two huge general strikes.  

No more Trayvon Martins—no more shared sacrifice. Jobs for all.
Read More
Posted in California, justice system, police brutality, public workers, racism, strikes, union-busting, unions | No comments

Monday, 8 July 2013

BART Strike: Bosses relieved as the state comes in to make a deal

Posted on 15:10 by Unknown

by Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

This blog has been covering the dispute between employees of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART) management. The workers struck for four days and have since returned to work after Union leaders appealed to the state to intervene.  Both sides have agreed to extend the contract for 30 days or what is also referred to as a "cooling off " period. It is hoped that a resolution of differences can be made during this period. As we commented in a previous post, this is a mistake.  Not only were the BART workers on strike, but contracts were up for AC Transit workers who operate the buses and who are also in the train driver's union, the ATU, although a different local. In addition, City of Oakland workers who have also taken big hits over the past period are also legally able to strike and did strike for one day after their contract expired; they are represented by SEIU 1021 which also represents station agents and janitorial staff at BART.

Both BART and AC Transit contracts ended on June 30th. There should have been a coordinated union wide strike of all public sector unions under attack and in contract negotiations at the present time; it was a great opportunity. In fact, all these unions should have been coordinating a union wide offensive in conjunction with the communities we serve months and months before the deadlines.

The leaders of organized labor in this area refuse to take this road because they have the same world view as the bosses, they worship capitalism and the market and have no alternative. For them, mobilizing workers against the bosses' offensive would only lead to chaos. The BART strike, like all of them these days, is a defensive struggle. 

The bosses have waged their usual media offensive portraying these workers as greedy and unwilling to help out in times of need.  Their media portrays BART workers as uncaring and selfish when "shared sacrifice" is necessary and that many workers would willingly accept a job like that at BART.  Right wing anti-union mouthpieces fan these flames but every worker, if we stop to think for one minute, knows that it is not us that are closing fire stations, pricing education out of reach of working people, denying health care to those that can't afford it or throwing people out of their homes on behalf of the bankers who we bailed out not so long ago.  Even their trillion dollar wars that we are being forced to pay for through cuts in social services and living standards are hugely unpopular. We know that it is not the public the BART bosses care about, it is profits. It is big business and profits that is getting hurt by a BART strike.  As we pointed out previously, Jim Wunderman, the head of the Bay Area Council,  made this clear when he told the San Francisco Chronicle . “It would create a regional paralysis….it would put us in a world of hurt.”

The hope on the part of the union hierarchy is that some compromise can be made as it states in the flier above that is being distributed at BART stations by ATU 1555, the train drivers local.  But what's a fair compromise?   I will answer my own question. It is slightly fewer or less aggressive concessions than the bosses want.  Most workers earn much less than BART workers with no benefits at all. The flier says that everyone should have a good job but then why wasn't a demand for jobs a major issue in this dispute and why didn't all the unions that could legally strike for gains like this do so making them an issue. This would go a long way in drawing in the community and winning public support. At the very least, the buss drivers should have joined BART, they would have both benefited for it.  All indications prior to the strike showed that there was a strong mood for unity and united action between AC Transit and BART workers.

To counter the bosses' lies and to win support from the public who obviously are inconvenienced by a stoppage of this sort, the Unions should have had the demand for more jobs through a shorter workweek on the table and a call for a crash public investment injection for mass transit, infrastructure etc.  It was a mistake that BART, AC Transit and City of Oakland didn't come out together with concrete proposals aimed at the riding public like free transportation for senior citizens and improved service for the disabled.  There's not enough bus routes and not enough buses.   

The flier raises the issue of safety and BART workers having to work in high crime areas (or in this case stations) were they are assaulted.  As a former public sector worker I am well aware of this issue. Crime which makes victims out of travelers and BART workers is overwhelmingly a product of the mass unemployment of youth especially youth of color and our proposal for dealing with it and assuring the safety of our members and the general public should be jobs like those at BART, EBMUD (the water utility) where I used to work and other public sector workplaces. A job that can put food on the table would eliminate much of that crime. It is in our (unionized better paid workers) interests to oppose increased police presence as a means of making people safer.  Workers are never made "safe" by increased police presence which will be used to break strikes as they have historically and crush youth movements etc. What will make us safer eliminating poverty and despair and linking with the communities and especially the youth and that means we have to offer them something at contract times.  

The flier does make a very weak attempt to counter the bosses' media offensive portraying the  BART workers as uncaring but it is not enough. Our power lies in our ability to halt production and shutting down transportation shuts down or seriously impedes production and therefore profit taking. It is by relying on our own strength that we have won in the past and the way we can win in the present and in to the future, not by appealing to the state and the politicians of the 1%. 

Strikes have declined drastically over the last 20 years due to the bosses' offensive in the workplace and through anti-union legislation, but the events here in the Bay Area could have and still can change the balance of class forces and make some gains but the union leadership, by asking the state to intervene and halting the strike instead of spreading it has weakened us all; only a movement from below can change this situation. The bosses are intent on driving us back to conditions that existed prior to the great upsurge of the 1930's that built the CIO, they are driven by the crisis of capitalism to do this and the BART workers by striking have challenged this agenda. No matter what happens we thank them for taking a stand.

A setback for BART workers would be a set back for us all.

Read all our blogs on the Bay Area strikes in order from the oldest to the most recent:
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/06/a-bart-strike-opportunity-to-begin.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/06/a-bart-and-ac-transit-strike-can-halt.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/06/will-jerry-brown-stop-bart-strike-so.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bay-area-news-anti-worker-anti-union.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/chip-johson-attacks-city-of-oakland.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bart-workers-facts-about-why-theyre.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bart-strike-out-of-mouths-of-union.html
http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bart-strike-called-off-by-union-leaders.html
Read More
Posted in California, california public sector, public workers, strikes, unions | No comments

Friday, 5 July 2013

BART Strike Called Off by Union Leaders

Posted on 23:29 by Unknown


by Jack Gerson

Bay Area bosses must be jumping for joy! After four days, the strike by two Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) unions -- ATU 1555 and SEIU 1021 -- was called off last night by union leaders who had met yesterday evening with Jerry Brown's labor secretary, Marty Morgenstern. The strike was called off just as it was about to really put the screws to business in Oakland and San Francisco, who depend on BART to deliver much of their labor power and their customers.

Many workers take vacation or extended Fourth of July weekends for the first week of July, so everyone knew that the strike's impact was really going to be felt starting next Monday. The BART workers I spoke to on the lines knew it; BART management knew it; Jerry Brown and Marty Morgenstern knew it;  Bay Area business bosses knew it; and ATU and SEIU officials knew it.

So why would they call off the strike just when its impact was about to hit?

Well, they will say, the strike wasn't called off. It was just suspended for 30 days.   But lets face it, the union leaders have let the air out of the balloon. Under the best of circumstances it's very difficult to get workers to go out a second time when the time and effort they expended the first time seems to have been wasted. And with these union leaders at the helm, these are not the best of circumstances.

Then, they'll say, the public is upset because the strike makes it harder to get to work and harder to get around. The mainstream media has kept up a steady stream of editorials and articles savaging "greedy workers" who "hold the public hostage" with  "outrageous demands".  We've previously discussed how the BART workers' demands are not outrageous at all but rather are quite modest (see http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bart-workers-facts-about-why-theyre.html).           And we know who's been doling out the pain for years -- home foreclosures, cuts to essential services, privatizing and downsizing public education, looting the public treasury (trillions to the "too big to fail" banks), destroying the environment and frying the planet, and it sure hasn't been "greedy workers". No, it's been the banks and corporations that run this country and ruin this world, and the politicians and managers who do their bidding -- and the mass media talking heads and assorted hacks who obediently do their PR work. The BART strike was a threat to the capitalists because here were workers who said, "Enough!" to attacks on wages, pensions, service, and health and safety. Because of this -- because it was a strike against cuts, a strike against"shared sacrifice", a strike against austerity -- this strike was in the interest of all working people, of the public at large. Sure, transit strikes are inconvenient and can make getting around a real pain in the neck. But if we don't start taking austerity on now, in the not too distant future we will have nothing left -- no social security or pensions, no jobs at adequate pay, no affordable health care or housing, no decent public education.

The way to minimize the inconvenience is not to give up and give in, but to stand together and fight: to (1) build community support by explaining widely and clearly why it is in the interest of the whole working class community to support this fight against austerity; and (2) spread the strike. The longer the picket line and the stronger the fight, the shorter the strike.

But alas, the ATU and SEIU union officials have done little to build community support and nothing to spread the strike. They did not actively portray the strike as a fight against austerity. Nor did they reach out to the community by demanding -- or even talking about the need for --  free and adequate expanded mass transit.

As far as spreading the strike, the most natural place to start would be to the AC Transit bus drivers whose routes cover Oakland and surrounding communities, as well as the routes from these communities to San Francisco. In fact, the AC Transit bus drivers, like the BART train drivers, are represented by the ATU (the bus drivers are in ATU local 192; the train drivers are in ATU local 1555). And the bus drivers contract has expired, so they could legally strike on 24 hours notice!  But despite considerable pressure from rank and file bus drivers who wanted to walk out during the BART strike -- both to show solidarity and to maximize the strength of their own fight -- the ATU leadership blocked the AC Transit drivers from striking (as discussed previously on this blog -- see http://weknowwhatsup.blogspot.com/2013/07/bart-strike-out-of-mouths-of-union.html)

The second most logical place to spread the strike would be to the Oakland city workers represented by SEIU 1021. Yes, that's the same SEIU local that represents striking BART workers. Like the AC Transit drivers, the Oakland city workers contract is expired. And in fact, they did go out on strike. On the first day of the BART strike, July 1. For one day. And then, after making many speeches and having let their members blow off steam, the SEIU 1021 officials marched them right back to work on July 2.

Why wouldn't they fight? Why wouldn't they spread the strike? Why wouldn't they promote an aggressive community alliance against austerity? Well, for the most part, union officials have long since made their peace with the system. They fundamentally don't believe that workers can defeat capital, and even more fundamentally they see themselves as part of the system. They have bought into the idea that workers have to sacrifice ("shared sacrifice") to fix budget deficits, just as the private sector union bureaucrats long ago bought into the idea that the unions have to help "their" corporations prosper. So the public sector union bureaucrats follow down the disastrous road that has led to the near-extinction of private sector unions: the "team concept" of class collaboration. They  want to show that they're "team players", on the same team as Jerry Brown (and Barack Obama, and Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, etc.) -- just like UAW President Bob King strives to prove that he's on the same team as the CEOs of Ford, GM, and Chrysler.

But it's not the working class that's responsible for those budget deficits -- the culprits there are the banks and corporations that looted trillions over the past several decades in a gigantic expropriation of wealth from the working class, and who now accelerate this expropriation by gross privatization (trying to commodify education, water -- everything; trying to take back all the hard-fought gains won by the working class over decades).  This is a society whose priorities are upside down. They need to be turned right side up, and that's going to  require a complete break with the policies of nearly all of our current union leaders, "the team concept" that substitutes class collaboration in place of class struggle.




Read More
Posted in austerity, BART, public sector, public workers, strikes, Team Concept, unions | No comments

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

BART Strike: Out of the mouths of Union consultants.

Posted on 11:09 by Unknown

A BART/AC Transit strike could make real gains
by Richard Mellor
Afscme Local 444, retired

Continuing the thread about the labor disputes here in the San Francisco Bay Area with the BART (subway) workers on strike and the AC Transit (bus drivers) out of contract and still negotiating, I read an interesting couple of comments in the San Francisco Chronicle this morning.  The  (AC Transit) bus driver’s Union leadership has chosen not to strike alongside the BART workers although they can legally do so and are in the same union, the ATU. Every bus driver I spoke to at the Board Meeting last week agreed that if the two walked out together and coordinated their a strike, the chances of winning would be increased. “ Unity is strength” is a slogan every worker understands. The City of Oakland workers could also strike.

Greg Harper, the president of the Alameda County Transit Board which governs the transit agency is very happy that the drivers didn’t go on strike with the BART workers. The drivers, “Really understood the situation, and we really appreciate the fact that they came in,”  (to work), he tells the Chronicle. 

His remarks are followed by the following comments, “The thing about the bus driver is that that they are right there with the public. They even know the names of their passengers and they are deeply committed to provide service.”

Perhaps it is Harper’s underling, I thought, maybe the company lawyer. No, these remarks come from the mouth of Sharon Cornu who the Chronicle describes as a “transit union spokeswoman.”  She is happy that the BART workers fight against the bosses, a struggle over putting food on the table, is made considerably more difficult by the decision of the AC Transit drivers Union leadership to have their members stay on the job. It helps neither bus drivers nor train operators that this is the case.

To the folks who pay the dues that contribute to the obscene salaries many of the top labor officials make, and who hire so called “consultants” like Sharon Cornu.: Here is the problem with our movement today.

I saw Ms Cornu at last week’s AC Transit Board meeting. I didn’t recognize her at first and thought she was a former employee of AFSCME, my former Union.  She was slinking around trying to make connections with Union officials promoting herself as a consultant. She is quite the popular one.  She is a former staffer to Jean Quan the Mayor of Oakland that had the cops brutalize Occupy Oakland.  She has been the Governor’s Minority Business of the Year person and she was the head of the Alameda Labor Council, the state arm of the AFL-CIO and the AFL-CIO’s National Field Director

Ms Cornu is very well educated like many of those in the lower rungs of the right wing trade union bureaucracy graduating magna cum laude from Brown University, a famous US liberal college. 

This is nothing new. Labor’s full time apparatus consists of many former and sometimes present leftists and highly educated folks like Ms Cornu.  The trade union bureaucracy, not too well up on labor history and economics, find them very useful as advisors on such affairs and spokespersons at times like these. The folks atop organized labor do not like too much publicity either, in fact, its preferable that the members they represent and who’s hard earned dues money lubricates the wheels of the organization and pays their salaries don’t know who they are which is sadly the case.

The answer to this criticism from above will be that the members decide or the “members have spoken”.  This is the officialdom’s example of how democratic they are.  The same line is dragged out when they bring the bosses message to their members at contract time, you can strike though we haven’t prepared for one and don’t believe we can win one or you can accept 20% wage cuts.   “And by the way, we are in difficult times and shared sacrifice is needed to save the country from collapse.” The members choose the cuts and democracy has run its course.

I have been accused, including by some socialists, of having a principle of denouncing the trade union bureaucracy. But this is not the case. If any union leader or group of our leaders take steps forward, abandons the Team Concept and labor/management partnerships and really fight for gains for their members and the working class as a whole, then I support that and would gladly use my time helping in that regard. What myself, and others like me refuse to do is ignore the extremely negative and class collaborationist role the trade union hierarchy plays. A role supported by academics and liberal intellectuals and folks like Ms Cornu who are looking to make a nice career off of the backs of working people. The strikes we have lost over the last 40 years from the P9 Hormel strike to Eastern Airlines, Teamsters Newspaper strike in Detroit, the Staley war, and the California grocery workers strike in 2003 were all due to the role of the trade union leadership at the highest levels.  Added to this to be honest, is the role that so many leftists also play by refusing to openly challenge these policies and campaign for an alternative among the ranks. By doing this they consciously or unconsciously act as a left cover for them.

If we do not make this clear, that these decisions like the AC Transit unions decision to help out while their brothers and sisters are on strike, comes from the top down, then we have to blame the members which is what happens.   But leadership has responsibilities and in times of heightened class struggle leadership is crucial. I was at the AC transit board meeting last week and there was a tremendous mood for unity there.  Workers are clearly angry.  Sometimes the anger can and will overcome the obstacle of their own leadership and the leadership lose control for a while.  But a powerful combination of the bosses and our own leaders is not an easy one to confront But confront it we must if we are to halt the bosses efforts to take back what has taken the US working class 150 years to win.

It’s the same with demands in times like these; the strategy of the trade union hierarchy and its academic advisers is damage control. The union leadership echoes the 1%’s claims that we are in hard times and that we are weak and them strong, that we need shared sacrifice (us and Warren Buffet together) and that we can’t win. They are good at telling us what we “can’t” do. The average member looks at this scenario, correctly sees to challenge it would mean a huge struggle yet there’s no real opposition out there (the left really has no significant impact on workers lives) so they bury their heads and slip further back hoping for better times. But better times are not coming; we cannot avoid a fight. Also, our health care is connected to our employment, this is another trick.

I would bet my house on it that in the present situation and with the anger that exists not just among union members but in society as a whole, were there serious and established fighting caucuses in the unions offering an alternative to the concessionary stance of the leadership we would see a more widespread strike and also organizing and involvement of the unorganized and our communities, even if such a caucus wasn’t represented in the leadership. The anger in society is suppressed by the union leadership and their allies in academia and directed in to electoral politics and their friends in the Democratic Party.  It has yet no organizational form. Most of these people like Ms. Cornu whose comments provoked me to write this commentary, (my opponents call it a rant) are agents of the Democratic Party in the workers’ movement.

I am not condemning education or all academics.  Many people from privileged backgrounds have sacrificed their time and their lives for workers and our movement.  But they did it abandoning their own class position. But those who have power and influence in our movement use their privileged status also to bully workers intellectually.  I know from personal experience that this can be a difficult thing to overcome. Race and gender oppression holds us back; but class oppression cannot be underestimated---class consciousness and recognizing who are our best allies can give us a powerful advantage.

Read more about this dispute by scrolling down or checking the "popular posts" to the right.
Read More
Posted in california public sector, public workers, strikes, Team Concept, unions | No comments

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

BART Workers -- The Facts About Why They're Striking

Posted on 21:36 by Unknown
by Jack Gerson



I spent some time on the lines with striking BART workers today, picketing in 100-plus-degree heat out in eastern Alameda County (about 30 miles from San Francisco).  Before heading out to the lines, I tried to find out what I could about what’s in dispute: what the union is asking for, and what management is demanding.  It’s hard to find this information in the mainstream media, which is mainly interested in bashing “greedy workers” who want to make life miserable for the public and jeopardize the region’s economy.  

As readers of this blog know, this is a strike by two unions (ATU Local 1555, representing about 1,000 drivers and station agents) and SEIU 1021 (representing about 1,400 maintenance workers and inspectors).  Four years ago, the BART unions agreed to “shared sacrifice” to  “help the system” during the recession.  They agreed to concessions that saved BART an estimated $100 million, including a wage freeze and a hiring freeze.  So they haven’t had a raise in five years, BART has 8% fewer workers, and work-related injuries are up 43% compared to 2009.

There are lots of problems with buying into “shared sacrifice”.  As BART workers have discovered, one of them is that management doesn’t just want workers to sacrifice when times are bad.  They also demand sacrifices when times are good. So although BART now projects a $125 million per year surplus for the next ten years, management is demanding more concessions from the unions.

BART management’s proposed settlement calls for a 4-year contract, to include wage increases of 2% per year that would be more than offset by increased worker contributions to pensions and health care. The BART unions estimate that management’s proposal would amount to a net cut to total compensation of more than 3%, and real compensation would be eroded further by increased cost of living.

The BART unions are asking for a 3-year contract with pay increases of 5% per year, no increased worker contributions to pensions and health care, and improved safety conditions. Management and the mainstream media portray this as “outrageous” demands by “greedy workers”.  But considering that BART workers haven’t had a raise in five years, what they’re asking for amounts to less than 2% per year over an eight-year period that includes the past five years. BART management says that workers’ pay averages about $71,000 / year. The unions dispute that figure – but the fact is, $71,000 / year is less than the $74,341 / year that the Oakland-based Center for Community Economic Development says a family of four needs to get by in the Bay Area.

Long story short: the BART workers are asking for very little, especially since they’ve gone five years without a raise. What they’re asking for, really, is to hold the line. Management wants more sacrifices – that’s spelled A-U-S-T-E-R-I-T-Y. They want BART workers to take cuts to their overall compensation. They don’t want to fix the deteriorating safety conditions that have so sharply increased work-related injuries – and that put the safety of the BART-riding public at risk.

This is really a defensive strike over very modest demands. The media and the bosses are presenting it as something else because even this very modest strike threatens them: here is a union that has the temerity to actually say “Enough! We won’t sacrifice this time!” and to actually go out on strike. The workers I spoke to told me, “We’re not just fighting for us. We’re fighting for all unions, to say ‘No More Cuts’”.

If only they would take their stance forward to aggressively reach out to the entire working class community: First, to aggressively demand an expansion of free, accessible, and adequate mass transit – paid for at the expense of the banks and corporations (they got bailed out; we got our services slashed). Second, to demand jobs at adequate pay for all – an especially important demand for relatively higher-paid workers to embrace. And if only the more than a dozen other Bay Area unions with expired contracts (including their brothers and sisters in the ATU east bay bus drivers’ local) would join them!




Read More
Posted in austerity, BART, public sector, public workers, strikes, unions | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Remembering 911
  • Syria, Middle East, World balance of forces:Coming apart at the seams?
    by Sean O' Torrain Over the past years tens of millions of people have taken to the streets of the world to protest the conditions in wh...
  • Capitalism and catastrophe: The Case For Ecosocialism
  • Newtown massacre and the debate about gun ownership
    As to be expected, the local paper yesterday had yet more extensive coverage of the aftermath of the Newtown CT massacre and the need for gu...
  • A poem on the 74th Anniversary of Trotsky's murder
                                                                                  You Are The Old Man In The Blue House                        ...
  • US capitalism facing another quagmire in Syria.
    Kerry: only 20% of rebels are bad guys While I can't see any alternative for US capitalism but to follow up on the threat to bomb Syria,...
  • The NSA, Snowden, spying on Americans, Brazilians and everyone else
    We reprint this article by Glenn Greenwald which includes the video . It is from the Guardian UK via Reader Supported News . The Charlie R...
  • World Economy: The global crawl
    by Michael Roberts In this post I am returning to my theme that the world capitalist economy is in a Long Depression in which the recovery...
  • Christopher Dorner: The Defector Who Went Out With A Bang
    We share this piece from Glen Ford of the Black Agenda Report for our readers interest. A Black Agenda Radio commentary by executive editor...
  • MLK, Malcom X, no talk about the socialist history.
    At this time of celebration of the march on Washington it is important to see what happened in the struggle against racism. You will not hea...

Categories

  • Afghanistan (4)
  • Africa (8)
  • Afscme 444 (1)
  • anti-war movement (1)
  • art (6)
  • asia (15)
  • austerity (29)
  • Australia (4)
  • auto industry (3)
  • bailout (10)
  • bangladesh (9)
  • banks (11)
  • BART (13)
  • body image (4)
  • bradley Manning (17)
  • Britain (22)
  • California (17)
  • california public sector (18)
  • Canada (6)
  • capitalism (44)
  • catholic church (10)
  • child abuse. (1)
  • China (2)
  • consciousness (3)
  • debt (3)
  • Democrats (4)
  • domestic violence (7)
  • drug industry (6)
  • economics (43)
  • education (9)
  • Egypt (5)
  • energy (7)
  • environment (12)
  • EU (18)
  • family (1)
  • financialization (1)
  • food production (7)
  • gay rights (2)
  • globalization (17)
  • greece (3)
  • gun rights (4)
  • health care (13)
  • homelessness (4)
  • housing (3)
  • hugo chavez (4)
  • human nature (6)
  • humor (4)
  • immigration (2)
  • imperialism (14)
  • india (4)
  • indigenous movement (4)
  • Internet (1)
  • iran (4)
  • Iraq (4)
  • ireland (22)
  • Israel/Palestine (13)
  • Italy (3)
  • Japan (7)
  • justice system (11)
  • labor (15)
  • Latin America (17)
  • marxism (52)
  • mass media (4)
  • mass transit (1)
  • Mexico (4)
  • middle east (24)
  • minimum wage (4)
  • movie reviews (1)
  • music (2)
  • nationalism (2)
  • NEA (1)
  • Nigeria (1)
  • non-union (11)
  • nuclear (3)
  • Oakland (5)
  • Obama (14)
  • occupy oakland (2)
  • occupy wall street (1)
  • oil industry (2)
  • OUSD (1)
  • Pakistan (3)
  • Pensions (2)
  • police brutality (6)
  • politicians (6)
  • politics (22)
  • pollution (11)
  • poverty (7)
  • prisons (8)
  • privatization (6)
  • profits (21)
  • protectionism (2)
  • public education (9)
  • public sector (15)
  • public workers (6)
  • racism (18)
  • rape (2)
  • Religion (10)
  • Russia (1)
  • San Leandro (2)
  • sexism (21)
  • sexual violence (2)
  • Snowden (7)
  • socialism (22)
  • soldiers (1)
  • solidarity (1)
  • South Africa (15)
  • Spain (2)
  • speculation (1)
  • sport (2)
  • strikes (35)
  • students (3)
  • surveillance (1)
  • Syria (9)
  • tax the rich (4)
  • taxes (1)
  • Teachers (6)
  • Team Concept (4)
  • terrorism (22)
  • the right (2)
  • Trayvon Martin (3)
  • turkey (3)
  • UAW (3)
  • unemployment (1)
  • union-busting (3)
  • unions (51)
  • US economy (22)
  • us elections (6)
  • US foreign policy (41)
  • US military (26)
  • veterans (1)
  • wall street criminals (13)
  • War (15)
  • wealth (9)
  • wikileaks (12)
  • women (26)
  • worker's party (2)
  • worker's struggle (65)
  • workers (44)
  • Workers International Network (1)
  • world economy (28)
  • youth (5)
  • Zionism (13)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (410)
    • ▼  September (21)
      • Remembering 911
      • Buffet and Lemann: two peas in pod
      • Amtrak: Washington DC to Huntington, West Virginia
      • Kaiser cancelled from AFL-CIO convention
      • Starvation, poverty and disease are market driven.
      • Austerity hits troops as rations are cut
      • Chile: 40 year anniversary.
      • The US government and state terrorism
      • Canada. Unifor's Founding Convention: The Predicta...
      • Syria, Middle East, World balance of forces:Comin...
      • Bloomberg: de Blasio's campaign racist and class w...
      • Beefed up SWAT teams sent to WalMart protests
      • U.S. Had Planned Syrian Civilian Catastrophe Since...
      • Syria. Will US masses have their say?
      • US capitalism facing another quagmire in Syria.
      • The debate on the causes of the Great Recession
      • Seamus Heaney Irish poet dies.
      • The crimes of US capitalism
      • Talking to workers
      • Don't forget the California Prison Hunger Strikers
      • Mothering: Having a baby is not the same everywhere
    • ►  August (54)
    • ►  July (55)
    • ►  June (43)
    • ►  May (41)
    • ►  April (49)
    • ►  March (56)
    • ►  February (46)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (90)
    • ►  December (43)
    • ►  November (47)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile