classwarfare

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 January 2013

Minting a trillion dollars

Posted on 10:17 by Unknown
by Michael Roberts

One reader asked me to comment on the talk about the US Treasury and Federal Reserve minting a platinum coin with a face value of $1trillion to provide funds for the government to spend if the Republican-controlled Congress blocks an increase in the public debt ceiling and brings US public services to a halt.  Is this possible and what implications does it have for the economy?
Well, in a way the issue is now dead.  Over the weekend, the US Treasury department issued a statement to say that the loophole in federal law that would allow the government to mint this coin would not be applied for the purpose of avoiding an increase in the debt limit.  So it ain’t going to happen.  The Federal Reserve was not going to credit the government’s accounts with $1 trillion if the Treasury department had minted the coin.  So minting money (as opposed to printing it) as a way of funding government borrowing has been ruled out.

And that is what it was.  The platinum coin was just another way for the government to borrow money through the Fed creating it in the government’s accounts.  The government was being blocked from issuing any more ‘debt’ i.e. bonds or T-bills, but it could mint a coin and thus bypass the so-called ceiling on debt set by Congress each year.

Keynesians like Paul Krugman were all gung-ho about minting the coin so that the bluff of the Republican veto on government borrowing and spending could be called.  “Minting the coin would be undignified, but so what?” said Krugman.  “it would be economically harmless and help head off government by blackmail”.

Economically harmless?  Well, yes.  If the Fed created a credit line of $1trillion for the government in return for a platinum coin as an asset that would not necessarily be inflationary.  First, the Fed could sell off other assets like the huge amount of government bonds it already holds to fund the new government borrowing.  In that way it would ‘soak’ up the extra cash going into the economy from new government spending.  If it did not do this, then there would be extra money in the economy.  But then that would happen anyway when the debt ceiling was raised, as it will have to be if the Federal government is to function beyond next month.  So there is nothing new there.

But there were two objections to the coin minting plan that were raised.  The first was that it made a laughing stock of the US government in the eyes of potential purchasers of US government debt, especially foreigners who already hold 40% of it.  How does it secure confidence that America’s officials are managing their public finances properly when Congress goes into paralysis and President Obama then announces that he has minted a $1trn coin to cover things?

Indeed, for the first time, the Federal Reserve would be creating money explicitly to fund the government’s deficit and not just to expand the money supply in attempt to boost the economy, as with QE measures.  This would be monetising the debt by doing the bidding of the government and not remaining ‘independent’ as mainstream economists prefer the Fed to be.  The consensus among pro-capitalist economists is that by minting the coin, the Fed would be jeopardising its role as the lender of last resort for all the capitalist economy in return for helping one particular government out of its hole.  A bad precedent indeed.  No wonder, Bernanke said, no way Barack.

The second objection was that ‘down the road’, unless this extra funding is paid for through more taxes or less government spending, the extra borrowing (that would happen anyway if the debt ceiling is raised) would eventually drive up inflation.  Keynesians like Krugman said that is ridiculous in the current environment with 8% unemployment rate, inflation well below 2% and interest rates ‘zero bound’.  That’s surely true – right now.  The real issue is not inflation as such – but the fight between those who reckon that rising government spending will boost economic growth and those who reckon that it will only squeeze the private sector and lower profitability.  On that issue, neither the Keynesians nor the Austerians can mint a coin.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in US economy | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Austerity USA Begins March 1st:
    We reprint this article for the interest of our readers. Facts For Working People is not affiliated with Workers' Action. To read more f...
  • Starvation, poverty and disease are market driven.
    by Richard Mellor Afscme Local 444, retired What a tragedy. A beautiful little boy who should be experiencing all the pleasures that a heal...
  • Amtrak: Washington DC to Huntington, West Virginia
    A Poem by Kevin Higgins   At Union Station hope is a t-shirt on sale at seventy per cent off. Yesterday, all the bow-tied barristers gather...
  • Kaiser cancelled from AFL-CIO convention
    A short CNA clip from Kaiser nurses.  The AFL-CIO convention was apparently ready to applaud kaiser as the model health care provider.  The ...
  • Remembering 911
  • Buffet and Lemann: two peas in pod
    Jorge Lemann: won't eat what he produces by Richard Mellor GED Afscme local 444, retired In a previous piece I commen...
  • Austerity hits troops as rations are cut
    The organizers of this blog have explained that US capitalism cannot afford to keep its massive military machine working at its present leve...
  • The NSA, Snowden, spying on Americans, Brazilians and everyone else
    We reprint this article by Glenn Greenwald which includes the video . It is from the Guardian UK via Reader Supported News . The Charlie R...
  • A poem on the 74th Anniversary of Trotsky's murder
                                                                                  You Are The Old Man In The Blue House                        ...
  • Cambodians clash with cops over land grabs
    Like China, there are repeated clashes between authorities and the population over the government's seizure of land for developers. Ther...

Categories

  • Afghanistan (4)
  • Africa (8)
  • Afscme 444 (1)
  • anti-war movement (1)
  • art (6)
  • asia (15)
  • austerity (29)
  • Australia (4)
  • auto industry (3)
  • bailout (10)
  • bangladesh (9)
  • banks (11)
  • BART (13)
  • body image (4)
  • bradley Manning (17)
  • Britain (22)
  • California (17)
  • california public sector (18)
  • Canada (6)
  • capitalism (44)
  • catholic church (10)
  • child abuse. (1)
  • China (2)
  • consciousness (3)
  • debt (3)
  • Democrats (4)
  • domestic violence (7)
  • drug industry (6)
  • economics (43)
  • education (9)
  • Egypt (5)
  • energy (7)
  • environment (12)
  • EU (18)
  • family (1)
  • financialization (1)
  • food production (7)
  • gay rights (2)
  • globalization (17)
  • greece (3)
  • gun rights (4)
  • health care (13)
  • homelessness (4)
  • housing (3)
  • hugo chavez (4)
  • human nature (6)
  • humor (4)
  • immigration (2)
  • imperialism (14)
  • india (4)
  • indigenous movement (4)
  • Internet (1)
  • iran (4)
  • Iraq (4)
  • ireland (22)
  • Israel/Palestine (13)
  • Italy (3)
  • Japan (7)
  • justice system (11)
  • labor (15)
  • Latin America (17)
  • marxism (52)
  • mass media (4)
  • mass transit (1)
  • Mexico (4)
  • middle east (24)
  • minimum wage (4)
  • movie reviews (1)
  • music (2)
  • nationalism (2)
  • NEA (1)
  • Nigeria (1)
  • non-union (11)
  • nuclear (3)
  • Oakland (5)
  • Obama (14)
  • occupy oakland (2)
  • occupy wall street (1)
  • oil industry (2)
  • OUSD (1)
  • Pakistan (3)
  • Pensions (2)
  • police brutality (6)
  • politicians (6)
  • politics (22)
  • pollution (11)
  • poverty (7)
  • prisons (8)
  • privatization (6)
  • profits (21)
  • protectionism (2)
  • public education (9)
  • public sector (15)
  • public workers (6)
  • racism (18)
  • rape (2)
  • Religion (10)
  • Russia (1)
  • San Leandro (2)
  • sexism (21)
  • sexual violence (2)
  • Snowden (7)
  • socialism (22)
  • soldiers (1)
  • solidarity (1)
  • South Africa (15)
  • Spain (2)
  • speculation (1)
  • sport (2)
  • strikes (35)
  • students (3)
  • surveillance (1)
  • Syria (9)
  • tax the rich (4)
  • taxes (1)
  • Teachers (6)
  • Team Concept (4)
  • terrorism (22)
  • the right (2)
  • Trayvon Martin (3)
  • turkey (3)
  • UAW (3)
  • unemployment (1)
  • union-busting (3)
  • unions (51)
  • US economy (22)
  • us elections (6)
  • US foreign policy (41)
  • US military (26)
  • veterans (1)
  • wall street criminals (13)
  • War (15)
  • wealth (9)
  • wikileaks (12)
  • women (26)
  • worker's party (2)
  • worker's struggle (65)
  • workers (44)
  • Workers International Network (1)
  • world economy (28)
  • youth (5)
  • Zionism (13)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (410)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (54)
    • ►  July (55)
    • ►  June (43)
    • ►  May (41)
    • ►  April (49)
    • ►  March (56)
    • ►  February (46)
    • ▼  January (45)
      • Sweet Commerce: Mau Mau, Ireland and the British p...
      • UK: National Shop Stewards Network News
      • US Economy Still Crawling Along
      • Workers Intl. Network on the crisis in the British...
      • Pakistan Garment Factory Lays off 1000
      • Support Garfield High (Seattle) Boycott of High St...
      • Malians exact revenge on Muslim shopkeepers as Fre...
      • Korean union official on hunger strike needs your ...
      • Bradley Manning's fight for justice at Ft. Meade
      • Ireland: ULA statement on SP leaving the Alliance
      • South Africa: DLF statement on Farm Workers' Strug...
      • Meningitis pharmacy bosses looted firm before decl...
      • Union officialdom responsible for decline in membe...
      • Free Bradley Manning: Transparency isn’t treason
      • Capitalism at work: US workers fall further behind
      • AFT, NEA, and the Privatization Drive Against Publ...
      • The Austerity Mantra
      • World Economy: The global crawl
      • US Union membership continues to decline
      • South Africa: NATIONALISE MINES FOR CLIMATE JOBS
      • Ireland: the Catholic Church's assault on women's ...
      • World economy: Recovery, recession or depression?
      • Lance Armstrong: Cocaine dealers lining up for Opr...
      • Rape and the truth about false accusations.
      • Stand With the Women
      • Burmese days*
      • Crisis in the British SWP: An opportunity to build...
      • Minting a trillion dollars
      • Canada's Indigenous movement is Idle No More
      • US health care: A lesson in market failure
      • Leading member of British SWP resigns. The SWP is...
      • Obama's new CIA man: A man of peace who has always...
      • Privatization of Profit, Socialization of Loss: AI...
      • Women hold up half the sky and a whole lot more.
      • Don't forget the victims of Fukushima.
      • Banking: business as usual
      • Will Rand Paul try to convert the Jews to save them?
      • Zero Dark Thirty: A Pentagon Tale
      • Mass Protests Against Sexual Violence Spread Beyon...
      • Shark deaths are an environmental disaster
      • Bradley Manning: US Gov't wants to block whistle b...
      • From fiscal cliff to fiscal farce
      • Capitalism at work: Tragic shack fires in South Af...
      • Obama and the Fiscal Cliff fiasco
      • Arundhati Roy on Rape in India
  • ►  2012 (90)
    • ►  December (43)
    • ►  November (47)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile